#Internet Regulation
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Unmasking the Motives: Australia's Social Media Age Ban and Its Implications for Political Discourse
In recent developments, Australia’s major political parties have introduced legislation to ban social media access for individuals under 16, citing child protection as the primary motive. However, a closer examination suggests that these measures may be more about controlling the burgeoning influence of social media on political discourse than safeguarding the youth.The Facade of Child…
#2024#age verification#Australia#bipartisan legislation#child protection#civil liberties#digital rights#Free Speech#government policy#internet regulation#online censorship#political discourse#public engagement#social media ban#under-16#youth access
1 note
·
View note
Text
What the CRTC’s New Registration Requirements Mean for Regulating Everything from Online News Services to Podcast Providers
The CRTC last week released the first two of what is likely to become at least a dozen decisions involving the Online Streaming Act (aka Bill C-11). The decision, which attracted considerable commentary over the weekend, involves mandatory registration rules for audio and visual services that include far more than the large streaming services. The Commission says the registrations would give it…

View On WordPress
#bill c-11#broadcasting act#crtc#internet regulation#online news#online streaming act#podcasts#social media
0 notes
Text
Elon talking about how all levels of statehood are infiltrated by cultural Marxists (hey what do we have here) pisses me off cause buddy, if the Marxists were in charge you wouldn't be standing on a Wisconsin stage buying votes, you would have all your assets seized and redistributed to the people.
#imagine a tesla that actually follows safety regulations and isn't designed by a 54 year old whose midlife crisis is being an edgy teenager#or a twitter that isn't a far right hellhole of mass censorship#or a billionaire suffering actual tangible consequences for breaking laws#just stewing in his state house spewing venom on the internet while we all move on without him
23 notes
·
View notes
Text
Summary: “It’s okay to let people help you,” Jeff whispers, unsure if Abed can even hear him. “It’s weird that people want to,” Abed replies just as quietly, still facing the other direction. Abed is deteriorating very quickly, and his friends are here to help him. Takes place post-Troy leaving on a boat, right after "Bondage and Beta Male Sexuality".
Author: @1mechanicalalligator
#official fic poll#haveyoureadthisfic#pollblr#internet culture#fandom culture#fanfic#fanfiction#tumblr polls#fandom poll#Intro to Emotional Regulation#Community#community tv#community nbc#nbc community#trobed#troy and abed#ao3
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
i mean this in the like... nicest way possible, but there is no way to post your writing and/or art on the internet without running the very high risk of it getting scraped, whether you post it on tumblr, pillowfort, or ao3. sites being 'anti ai' does not mean your art cannot be scraped. it is simply almost impossible to prevent, much less guarantee that. I'm not saying this to be a pessimist or to stop people from being rightfully pissed about this. it sucks. massively so! but if the idea does in fact bother you that much, you should know that moving sites won't fix the issue. ao3, as far as we know, has been scraped/is getting scraped. you can set your fics so that only logged in users can access them, but it only makes scraping one step more difficult, and by no means impossible and the otw has stated this clearly.
which, again, this sucks! i don't have a great solution either!! but tumblr is relatively honest, at least, when it tells you that it cannot prevent, only discourage it. ao3 said the same thing. any site promising you otherwise is, to the best of my knowledge, lying to you.
#*mine#mona rambles#personally my stance is and always has been a somewhat resigned 'if i post it on the Internet it might get stolen'#which ofc is.not optimal#but i see a lot of misinformation and supposed alternatives get thrown around and uhhh. yeah i don't think they are it imma be real#like you can find me on other sites i should make a post again#but the same way i never locked down my fics I'm not leaving tumblr over this#I'm not going to stop posting over the most recent art theft scheme and I'm wary of uninformed shouts for stricter copyright#considering we're yk#in fandom and that's a slippery slope#but i do think at the end of the day regulations will have to be the way to go#as of now there's just very little you can do. and again!! that sucks!! i get being upset i am too!!#but yeah realistically the next great social media site isn't going to 'finally be good trust me bro'
124 notes
·
View notes
Text
Anywhere on Earth time
A few days ago I posted about a grant with a deadline at 11:59 pm of Anywhere on Earth time. Somebody asked me "is this for real"???
Very much yes!
Anywhere on Earth time was invented in 1999 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, who in that year established a working group to develop standards for broadband for wireless metropolitan area networks. The goal of this group was to make sure that the wireless internet connection meet the same criteria internationally. We are talking about wireless internet around cities, but also mobile internet. All this started being regulated after 1999. The working group started releasing these standards and introduced the "Anywhere on Earth" time to put into practise the standards for the whole world at the same moment.
So yes. Anywhere on Earth time is a real thing. It is used only for deadlines, and it corresponds to the time when the deadline date passes for every single place on Earth. In practise, the last place to change the date on Earth are Howland and Baker Islands on the western side of the international date line. So the Anywhere on Earth time corresponds to whatever time the Howland and Baker Islands have.
#fun facts#internet#history#tech#technology development#anywhere on earth#time zones#internet history#regulations#original content
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
It's been nearly 8 years since america decided to fuck up the internet by destroying net neutrality, and the consequences are present as ever.
#jacob blogs#when people talk about the dead internet theory it's like#no duh#nobody can afford a webpage??#facebook insta youtube and netflix make up nearly half of all american internet traffic#like#are you fucking kidding me?#imagine paying hella for an ISP to connect you to the internet#and you can only access like 8 different websites??#fuck this noise#regulating the internet by way of forcing web pages to regulate themselves...#wow way to give power to the hosts that already had immense power to begin with#capitalism really is a disease
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
Oppose H.R. 1: the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act"
In May, House Republicans passed their partisan budget reconciliation bill, H.R. 1 the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” that will increase budget deficits by $2.4 trillion to finance trillions in tax cuts for the wealthy. This bill would enact the largest transfer of wealth from the poor the rich in decades.
Senate Republicans are now rewriting portions of the bill to satisfy strict Senate parliamentarian rules while also maintaining the House’s partisan wish list framework. These harmful provisions include:
Deep cuts to Medicaid, including harsh new work requirements
New Medicare eligibility rules and increased costs for dual Medicaid-Medicare enrollees
Tripling the budget for ICE and Trump’s mass deportation effort
Authorization for the sale of public lands and increased incentives for fossil fuel production
Widespread rollback of clean energy tax incentives and climate protections
Unprecedented funding cuts and expansion of work requirements for SNAP
Limits on a court’s ability to issue temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions
Funding cuts to clinical care services at Planned Parenthood and gender-affirming care for Medicaid and CHIP recipients
Requiring states block all AI regulation for 10 years in order to receive federal broadband funding
A $150 billion increase to an already bloated Pentagon budget
A national private school voucher program that diverts funding from public schools and sets up a new tax shelter for the wealthy
An increased excise tax on college endowments
Widespread changes to student loan access, protections, and repayment options
Harmful changes to federal worker pay, benefits, unions, and protections against unjust treatment
Slashes to funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) by nearly 70%
Elimination of a tax on gun silencer sales
Raising the debt limit by $5 trillion purely to fund tax cuts for the wealthy, adding trillions to the national debt.
Senate Republicans are aiming to pass their version of H.R. 1 by the July 4th holiday. Call your Senators and demand they oppose this destructive bill.
fax tool:
#us politics#aclu#fuck project 2025#stop internet censorship#lgbtq+#american politics#fuck donald trump#stop project 2025#stop bad bills#fight for the future#fuck trump#save the environment#environmentalism#the environment#save the usps#usps#consumer financial protection bureau#regulations#stop ai#ai regulation#save education#education rights#climate change#save the climate#stop climate change#fuck climate change#Stop project 2025#defeat project 2025#fuck mike lee#oligarchy
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
I imagine the underlying principle of being upset by the proposed TikTok ban is that hatred of government regulation trumps all other hatreds, which makes sense, but it's weird to see how many people apparently love TikTok now, after I thought we all agreed it was in fact the worst thing in the world and that it poisoned the internet and our species incurably
#I myself feel torn#on the one hand i hate tiktok with a delirious passion#can't say enough bad things about it#the rage is absolutely feral and violent#but also#government regulation. . .#of the internet#...#do not want#faced with the terrible prospect of suspending my hatred of power because the power is being used to do something I ostensibly desire
55 notes
·
View notes
Text
i think its some of damiens responsiblity to think what kinda relationship he cultivaded with his fans. and why is centering his need for explaning, defending and further protecting his self/image is his knee jerk reaction. unless you do those things a social media break is just another way of image management. plus it wont feel better when you come back and you are still centering your image which causes you too act defensive/childish. you cant support things thru acts of fear and nervousness and not expact them to crumble! i know people joked abour his virtue signalling in the past, and they are jokes, but its a curious thing people notice that around him enough to point that out. i hope he can actually look into that part of himself with a more honest critical lense.also these twitch stream where he wants this magicaly ''positive'' enviroment where people can ''escape'' is just unrealistic at best. this is a livestream where people rush on each other to talk to you. its by nature feeding into these things im afraidi positivity is not the warm blanket you think it is, its more of a trap lol
#some thoughts#blocking fans in general is a very emotional but stupid move lol(to me) as a somewhat public figure he must understand that block feature i#practically useless to him other than get his frustration out maybe for a minute? then what?#it only creates a snowball effect.#idk its feels counterproductive altho i can still understand where the frustration is coming from#stan twitter can be nasty. getting cussed by 17 year old with no emotional regulation and too much time lol#anyways this is absolutely not about him having the perfect response/apology.. that'll happen and idc about pr managing his reactions lol#also personally i dont find the joke much of a big deal. its whatever. lazy lowblow at worst#he just needs to be realistic about his internet presence and how it interacts with his defensive/nervous personality#and in grand scheme of things the way he interacts with ''activism''.. its not for him/about him.#at the end this reaction is a part of him! he can do what he will with that#hope he has people around him that can be critical about his intentions/reactions without it being taken as a personal attack
36 notes
·
View notes
Text
Physically I'm here but mentally I'm clawing the eyes out of everyone who talks crap about their children on the internet and posts them in their most vulnerable moments for clout
#i just saw a video of a like eleven or twelve year old girl approach her mom's car when she got home from work and without even saying hello#to her kid she yelled at her to go inside so she could talk to her husband first and then shouted at the kid when she said her dad put her#through hell that day. is she probably overreacting bc shes a kid and she doesnt have get emotional regulation yet? absolutely. but also?#as the kid who knew that if i didnt get to my mom with my side of things first that my dad would twist things to make himself look like the#victim in a situation i promise you that baby girl isnt feeling heard and that would be sucky but normal on its own. the type of thing#families work through together yknow? but to post that on the internet??? to be recording when you come home knoeing there are problems in#your house and wanting to put online forever a moment in time where there are really strained relationships among members of your family??#especially when it's the relationship btwn your husband and your child??? nope. im sorry. uh uh.#that kid deserves better than that. your husband deserves better than that. everyone deserves better than to have their really vulnerable#moments shared on the internet with strangers#like. i think about how i felt as a kid when i found out my parents had told a relative something i considered private. how embarrassed and#betrayed i felt. the thought that EVERYONE would see that instead of just my dad's relatives or w/e?#bby girl im incandescent with rage#anyway#lilac rambles
95 notes
·
View notes
Text
If you're following KOSA, you should also be following state legislation, which is much more rapidly adopting tech regulation related to child safety than Congress. For reference, in 2023, 13 states adopted 23 laws related to child safety online.
Even if your locality hasn't adopted similar tech regulation, online platforms, apps, and websites are rarely operating in only some states. When regulations become patchwork, it's often easier for companies to adopt policies reflective of the most stringent regulations relevant to their service for all users, rather than try to implement different policies for users based on each user's location.
I know this because that's what happened when patchwork data privacy regulations began swelling — which is why many webites have privacy policies reflective of the GDPR that apply even to users outside of Europe. I also know this because I'm a tech lawyer — I'm the wet cat drafting policies for and advising tech and video game companies on how to navigate messy, convoluted, and patchwork US regulatory obligations.
So, when I say this is how companies are thinking about this, I mean this is how my coworkers and I have to think about this. And because the US is such a large market, this could impact users outside the US, too.
#kosa#us law#tech policy#data privacy#regulatorycompliance#sorry if i tricked you into thinking this is a fandom account#this is just my blog of twelve years#and ive seen a lot about kosa#but local us legislation is where most of the movement here is#and there is a trend towards adopting laws and regulations related to minors online#that is rapidly gaining momentum#i love being an internet lawyer but i also love the internet#and so im feeling more and more compelled to talk about how the tectonic plates are shifting fast
27 notes
·
View notes
Text
Summary: Other people always seem to be in awe of Spock's perfect poise and control. But then, those people don't have access to his reports. Humor.
Author: @werewolves-are-real
#official fic poll#haveyoureadthisfic#pollblr#internet culture#fandom culture#fanfic#fanfiction#tumblr polls#fandom poll#Rules and Regulations#star trek#trek#star trek the original series#the original series#no romantic relationships#ao3
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
Mmmmm okay but honest question tho
The KOSA regulations would need to be implemented even if the companies offer their services only outside of the country? 🤔 And if they are established on another country and offer its services to usa, they need to implement the regulations right?
Because like, I was thinking of how mihoyo moved from china to avoid the censorship regulations globally, for example
And like, couldnt then social media companies preassure the goverment about doing that too, then
Like, even if they had to censor stuff for usa, they would be losing a lot of potential interactions because of the content theyre hiding, so if they had to censor everything in case of being established in usa (even if it is content being shown outside of the country), wouldnt it be better for them to just move the company to another country then. To continue having those extra interactions from "censored posts" shown to other countries.
Or even, if the cost of filtering the posts was too high, its possible some companies would choose to not offer their services to usa anymore. Idk how taxes to big companies work in those cases, but that would be a loss for them in the long term too right.
Like, isnt the whole bill a bad idea even commercially?
And couldnt it happen that companies publish a statement about getting out of the country in case the regulations were stablished?
#kids online safety act#kosa bill#stop kosa#politics#capitalism#I mean. spotify did a statement here about the changes in copyright laws#threatening to not offer their services anymore because they didnt want to pay extra#for example#so like. couldnt social media companies also do that in usa. about internet regulations#its a honest question#or are they scared of losing their conservative users. as they may talk shit about the company because of refusing the regulations?#or could it be fear of retaliation from the government/cia/stuff??? wouldnt it just be better for them all to move out of the country then#I just think its lowkey weird how the companies that would be affected by this regulations have been staying silent#are they just confident the bill wont pass then#lmao#long post
24 notes
·
View notes
Text

obsessed with this sentence. “she wore jewelry more than once, it has to mean something deeper.” ???????? necklaces etc are not typically considered single use!!
#something abt the phrasing of ‘other specific times’ is killing me#she wore a thing on a day and then again on another day!#if you’re like ‘hey isabel’s posting about these people a lot lately’#yes i’m v. stressed atm and this is like my go to internet activity for emotional regulation#esp now that the big it ends with us nothingburger seems to be over#fingers crossed chappell roan cancels a show for a photo op with jeff bezos
18 notes
·
View notes